Skip to content

Tool · Updated Sep 19, 2026

Automation priority scorer

List up to five processes and see them ranked for automation, with a score, the hours each takes today and the reason for its place.

Process 1
Half rules, half judgment

How often are there exceptions?

Is the data already in systems?

What does an error cost?

Assumptions
Weights, 0 to 5
See results
51Estimated score for Process 1, out of 100
  1. 1. Process 15114.4 hours a month · Worth scopingLow volume limits the payback
Estimated staff time, all processes
14.4 h a month
Monthly cost of that time
Add an hourly cost
Email me this ranking

How the numbers work

  • Hours a month multiply runs a week by minutes a run, over 52 weeks and 12 months.
  • Each process is rated from 0 to 1 on five factors, then weighted: volume (3), rules (2), few exceptions (3), data in systems (3), low error cost (2). The score is the weighted total as a share of 100. You can change every weight.
  • Volume earns full marks at 160 hours a month, about one person working full time, on a curve that rewards the first hours most.
  • The monthly cost is the time your team spends on the work today, at the hourly cost you enter. It is not an estimate of what automation would cost. Scores and hours are planning estimates from your inputs.
  • The factors follow our guide to choosing processes. Ownership and system access are not scored here: if nobody owns a process, or you cannot get permitted access to its data, it should wait.
Read the full guide

What to do next

Carry this into the next step, the full guide or the service behind it.

One useful email a month.

New guides, tools and practical notes on putting AI to work. No sales sequences.

See how an idea becomes a working solution.

Explore how we scope, build and hand over AI projects, with clear decisions at each stage.